Note: All future reports of Gallopedia will be updated on our web page. This Blog will be mentained for archieving purposes only.




Saturday, July 24, 2010

Gallopedia Highlights- Week # 127

Dated 4th – 10th July, 2010

This week’s report consists of 31 surveys. 1 of these is a multi-country survey. 14 polling organizations have been represented.


ASIA zone-1 national polls& 1 Multi national poll:
South Asia: India

Northeast Asia: Japan, China

EURO-AMERICAS zone-25 national polls & 2 Multi national polls:

East Europe- Russia

West Europe- France, UK, Spain, Germany, Netherlands

North America- U.S.A, Canada
Latin America- Brazil, Peru, Guatemala, Chile, Colombia

CYBER WORLD: 3 polls

Commentary: TOPIC OF THE WEEK
Widespread Support For Banning Full Islamic Veil in Western Europe

Most Americans Disapprove

(Pew Research Center) : <ȋ>On July 13, members of the lower house of the French parliament are expected to vote on a bill that would make it illegal for Muslim women to wear full veils – those that cover all of the face except the eyes – in public places. A survey by the Pew Research Center’s Global Attitudes Project, conducted April 7 to May 8, finds that the French public overwhelmingly endorses this measure; 82% approve of a ban on Muslim women wearing full veils in public, including schools, hospitals and government offices, while just 17% disapprove. 1

Majorities in Germany (71%), Britain (62%) and Spain (59%) would also support a similar ban in their own countries. In contrast, most Americans would oppose such a measure; 65% say they would disapprove of a ban on Muslim women wearing full veils in public places compared with 28% who say they would approve.

In the four Western European countries surveyed as well as in the U.S., support for a ban on Muslim women wearing a full veil is more pronounced among those who are age 55 and older, although majorities across all age groups in France, Germany and Britain favor a ban. For example, 91% of French respondents age 55 and older approve of restrictions on Muslim women covering their face, compared with 81% of those ages 35 to 54 and 72% of those younger than 35.

In Spain, where 70% in the older group and a narrower majority (55%) of those ages 35 to 54 favor a ban on full veils, younger respondents are closely divided; 49% of those ages 18 to 34 approve of such measures and 47% disapprove. In the U.S., about one-third (35%) of those in the oldest age group say they would welcome a ban on veils that cover the whole face except the eyes, while 28% of those ages 35 to 54 and just 22% of those younger than 35 say the same.

Opinions about banning Muslim women from wearing a full veil do not vary along gender lines in any of the five countries where the question was asked. In France, Britain and the U.S., views on this matter are also similar across education and income groups. However, in Spain and Germany, those in higher income groups are more likely than the less affluent to approve of such a ban; for example, a slim majority (51%) of low-income respondents in Spain favor a ban on full veils, compared with 62% of those in the middle-income range and 68% of those with high incomes.

Ideologically, those on the right in France, Britain and Germany are more likely than those on the left to approve of a ban on women wearing the full Islamic veil in public places, but majorities across the political spectrum in these countries endorse such a ban. In France, 87% of those on the right support prohibiting women from wearing full veils in public, and 75% of those on the political left agree. Spain is the only Western European country surveyed where those on both ends of the ideology scale express nearly identical views; 59% of those on the right and 57% of those on the left approve of a ban on Muslim women wearing veils that cover the whole face. Ideological differences are also insignificant in the U.S.

1 This question was asked in Western Europe and the U.S. as part of the Spring 2010 Pew Global Attitudes Survey, which included 22 nations. For more findings from this survey, see “Obama More Popular Abroad Than at Home, Global Image of U.S. Continues to Benefit,” released June 17, 2010.

SOURCE: http://pewglobal.org/2010/07/08/widespread-support-for-banning-full-islamic-veil-in-western-europe/

---------------
The complete detailed weekly reports of the project can be found on theGilani's Gallopedia website.

Gallopedia Highlights- Week # 126

Dated 27th June- 3rd July, 2010

This week’s report consists of 24 surveys. 2 of these are multi-country surveys. 9 polling organizations have been represented.


ASIA zone-3 national polls & 1 Multi National poll:
West Asia: Turkey

Middle East & N Africa: Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon, Palestine

South Asia: Pakistan, India

Northeast Asia: China, Taiwan, South Korea, Japan

Southeast Asia: Indonesia

AFRICA zone- 2 Multi National polls:

West Africa: Nigeria

Central Africa: Uganda, Rwanda, Kenya, Tanzania, Burundi

EURO-AMERICAS zone-18 national polls & 1 Multi national polls:

East Europe- Russia, Poland

West Europe- France, UK, Spain, Germany

North America- U.S.A, Canada
Latin America- Argentina, Mexico, Brazil

Australasia: New Zealand, Australia,

CYBER WORLD: 1 poll

Commentary:

TOPIC OF THE WEEK
CHANGING PERCEPTIONS ON GENDER EQUITY

(Pew Research Center): Fifteen years after the United Nations Fourth World Conference on Women’s Beijing Platform for Action proclaimed that “shared power and responsibility should be established between women and men at home, in the workplace and in the wider national and international communities,” people around the globe embrace the document’s key principles.

Almost everywhere, solid majorities express support for gender equality and agree that women should be able to work outside the home. Most also find a marriage in which both spouses share financial and household responsibilities to be more satisfying than one in which the husband provides for the family and the wife takes care of the house and children. In addition, majorities in most countries reject the notion that higher education is more important for a boy than for a girl.

Yet, despite a general consensus that women should have the same rights as men, people in many countries around the world say gender inequalities persist in their countries. Many say that men get more opportunities than equally qualified women for jobs that pay well and that life is generally better for men than it is for women in their countries. This is especially so in some of the wealthier nations surveyed. And while majorities in nearly every country surveyed express support for gender equality, equal rights supporters in most countries say that more changes are needed to ensure that women have the same rights as men.

A special in-depth 22-nation survey by the Pew Research Center’s Global Attitudes Project, conducted April 7 to May 8, looks at views on gender equality, done in association with the International Herald Tribune. It suggests that while egalitarian sentiments are pervasive, they are less than robust; when economically challenging times arise many feel men should be given preferential treatment over women in the search for employment.

This is especially true in the predominantly Muslim countries surveyed as well as in India, China, South Korea and Nigeria. In these countries, solid majorities agree that women should be able to work outside the home; yet, most also agree that men should have more right to a job than women when jobs are scarce. For example, about six-in-ten in Egypt (61%) and Jordan (58%) say women should have the right to work outside the home, but even larger shares (75% and 68%, respectively) say the priority should be for men to have jobs.

Majorities in every country polled agree that women should be able to work outside the home. In 17 of the 22 countries, most say they completely agree with this assertion, including at least three-quarters in Brazil (88%), Britain (84%), the U.S. (81%) and Germany (79%).

Solid majorities in virtually every country surveyed say that women should have the same rights as men. This opinion is nearly unanimous in Western European and Latin American countries, as well as in the U.S., Poland, Lebanon, China, India, and South Korea; at least nine-in-ten men and women in these countries express support for gender equality. Only in Nigeria does a majority (54%) reject the idea that women and men should have equal rights.

In 19 of 22 countries, majorities say that a marriage where both husband and wife have jobs and take care of the house and children is a more satisfying way of life than having the husband provide financially while the wife cares for the household.

Publics across the countries surveyed offer mixed views on whether men should have more of a right to a job than women during tough economic times. Majorities in 11 of 22 countries surveyed reject this idea, and this is particularly true in the U.S. and Western Europe. In Nigeria as well as in many Asian and predominantly Muslim countries, however, most respondents say that men should receive preferential treatment when jobs are scarce.

Publics in 18 of 22 countries disagree with the notion that a university education is more important for a boy than for a girl. And in 10 of these countries, many strongly reject this idea; majorities in Lebanon (84%), Brazil (78%), Argentina (72%), Britain (71%), France (70%), Mexico (65%), Germany (64%), Spain (62%), the U.S. (60%), and Kenya (59%) completely disagree that is it more important for a boy to receive a university education. Still, a solid majority in India (63%) and about half in Pakistan (51%), Egypt (50%) and China (48%) say that a university education is more important for a boy than for a girl, and sizeable minorities in several countries agree.

In four of the seven countries where the question was asked, clear majorities of Muslims say that women should have the right to decide if they wear a veil. This view is most widespread in Turkey, Indonesia and Lebanon.

Opinions about who has a better life – men or women –are mixed. In 10 of 22 nations, majorities or pluralities say that, all things considered, men have the better life in their countries. In 10 others, more volunteer that there is no difference than say that life is better for one sex than the other. Only in Japan and South Korea do pluralities say that life is better for women in their countries (47% and 49%, respectively).

SOURCE:http://pewresearch.org/pubs/1639/global-survey-gender-equality-women-rights-job-priority-education-girls

---------------

The complete detailed weekly reports of the project can be found on theGilani's Gallopedia website.

Friday, July 9, 2010

Gallopedia Highlights- Week # 125

Dated 20th-26th June, 2010

This week’s report consists of 27 surveys. 1 of these is a multi-country survey. 11 polling organizations have been represented.


ASIA zone-4 national polls & 1 Multi National poll:
West Asia: Turkey, Afghanistan

Middle East & N Africa: Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Palestine, Morocco,

GCC: Yemen

Central Asia: Kyrgyzstan

South Asia: Nepal,

Northeast Asia: South Korea

Southeast Asia: Indonesia, Thailand, Singapore, Philippines


AFRICA zone- 1 Multi National poll:

West Africa: Mauritania, Malí

Central Africa: Uganda, Tanzania, Chad

Southern Africa: Zambia, Zimbabwe, Malawi


EURO-AMERICAS zone-20 national polls & 1 Multi national polls:

East Europe- Czech Republic, Georgia, Kosovo, Albania, Macedonia, Cyprus

West Europe- France, Sweden, Ireland, UK, Spain

North America- U.S.A, Canada
Latin America- Uruguay, Paraguay, Brazil, Peru, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Chile, Bolivia, Panama, Venezuela,

Australasia: New Zealand, Australia,


CYBER WORLD: 2 polls

Commentary: Thais Urge for Dialogue, Not Elections, For Peace


June 23, 2010

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Many people in Thailand reject the notion that a new general election will achieve national reconciliation, according to a poll by Bangkok University. Only 16.6 % of respondents think dissolving the legislature is the best way forward.


Conversely, 28 % of respondents think the government should listen to representatives from all political parties in order to foster unity and stability, and 24.9 % believe the best course of action is to help the poor and create jobs.


Thailand has experienced more than three years of political instability, including the dissolution of the lower house, a cancelled national election, a military coup and the enactment of a new constitution. In December 2007, Thailand held a legislative ballot. Final results gave the People’s Power Party (PPP) 232 of the 480 seats, followed by the Democratic Party (PP) with 165 mandates. In January 2008, PPP leader Samak Sundaravej became prime minister.


Samak’s government faced fierce opposition and major street protests led by the civic organization People’s Alliance for Democracy (PAD). The group accused Samak of being a puppet of former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra, who was deposed in a 2006 military coup.


In August 2008, the PAD occupied the Government House in Bangkok, demanding Samak’s resignation. Samak stepped down in September after the national Constitutional Court found that he violated conflict of interest laws when he received payments for hosting two television cooking shows. Then Deputy Prime Minister Somchai Wongsawat took over as acting head of government.


In November, PAD yellow-clad activists took over Bangkok’s international airport—where the government had been working from after its offices were invaded in August—demanding Somchai’s resignation. The airport was forced to shut down entirely, stranding thousands of tourists.


In December, the Constitutional Court ordered the PPP and its two coalition partners, the Machima Thipatai Party and the Chart Thai Party, to disband after it found them guilty of voter fraud in the 2007 ballot. The court also banned Somchai and executives from the three parties from participating in politics for five years. Somchai accepted the verdict and stepped down. Protesters at the airport ended the siege. PP leader Abhisit Vejjajiva became prime minister, with the support of 235 lawmakers in the House of Representatives.


In March 2009, Thaksin accused Privy Council president Prem Tinsulanonda of masterminding the 2006 military coup, and openly called for a "people’s revolution" to topple the Abhisit government. In April, the National United Front of Democracy Against Dictatorship (UDD)—an extension of the Puea Thai Party led by Thaksin and whose followers wear red shirts—organized protests in Bangkok and Chonburi.


In June, the PAD’s Yellow Shirts formally created a political party, the New Politics Party, and chose labour activist Somsak Kosaisuk as its leader.


On Mar. 12, 2010, the Red Shirt movement took control of Ratchaprasong, an area in the heart of Bangkok’s commercial district, demanding early legislative elections and the resignation of Prime Minister Abhisit.


On May 13, after issuing several public warnings, the government ordered the military to enter the Red Shirts’ camp in Ratchaprasong and disperse the dissidents. Power, water and food supplies were cut from the camp. Eighty-five people died in the confrontations, which went on for days. The Red Shirts eventually surrendered. As they were leaving, some of them lit 36 buildings on fire, including a major shopping mall, and looted stores and banks. Another 54 people died in these events.


On May 25, a Thai court issued an arrest warrant against Thaksin on terrorism charges for his alleged participation in the Red Shirts’ actions.


Prime Minister Abhisit has set up four separate panels to study the incidents that led to last month’s violence. On Jun. 22, Chaturon Chaiseng, a former cabinet member under Thaksin, warned that the government has appointed only loyalists to these commissions, adding, "Abhisit’s plan excludes the opposition totally. The people he picked mostly supported the coup and the present constitution, which is the fundamental problem."


Polling Data

What should be the main priority for the government to achieve reconciliation?

Listening to the opinion of all parties

28.0%

Helping the poor, creating jobs

24.9%

Dissolving the legislature

16.6%

Launching an impartial investigation into recent political violence

9.5%

Arrest and punish terrorists

6.6%

Source: Bangkok University
Methodology: Interviews with 1,628 Thai adults, conducted on Jun. 16 and Jun. 16, 2010. No margin of error was provided.

SOURCE: http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/view/35669/thais_urge_for_dialogue_not_elections_for_peace

---------------
The complete detailed weekly reports of the project can be found on theGilani's Gallopedia website.

Saturday, July 3, 2010

Gallopedia Highlights- Week # 124

Dated 13th-19th June, 2010

This week’s report consists of 30 surveys. 3 of these are multi-country surveys. 12 polling organizations have been represented.


ASIA zone-4 national poll & 2 Multi National poll:
West Asia: Turkey

Middle East & N Africa: Israel, Egypt, Jordan, Lebanon

Central Asia: Kyrgyzstan

South Asia: India, Pakistan,

Northeast Asia: China, Japan, South Korea

Southeast Asia: Indonesia

AFRICA zone- 2 Multi National polls:

West Africa: Nigeria

Eastern Africa: Kenya

EURO-AMERICAS zone-23 national polls & 3 Multi national polls:

East Europe- Czech Republic, Poland, Russia

West Europe- UK, Spain, Netherlands, Germany, France

North America- U.S.A, Canada
Latin America- Brazil, México, Colombia, Honduras, Argentina

Commentary:

June 16, 2010

Ethnic Tensions Evident in Kyrgyzstan Before Conflict

Perceptions of ethnic, racial tolerance relatively low in South

by Steve Crabtree

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Gallup surveys in Kyrgyzstan reflect the ethnic tensions that sparked recent deadly riots in the South, home to the country's Uzbek minority. In 2009, 40% of residents living in southern Kyrgyzstan said their city or area is a good place for racial and ethnic minorities, while 61% living in the North said the same. Nationwide, fewer Kyrgyzstanis perceived tolerance of ethnic minorities in 2009 than in 2008, with the deterioration coming exclusively in the North, while perceptions remained unchanged in the South.

Surveys were conducted well before rioters in the southern region killed more than 170 people and caused more than 75,000 Uzbeks to flee the country in the past several days, but Gallup data document the divisions between the country's ethnic Kyrgyz and Uzbeks that have plagued the South for decades. The current violence comes more than a month after former President Kurmanbek Bakiyev was ousted and forced into exile, which has led some to suggest this was intended to disrupt the June referendum on constitution reform. Ethnic Uzbeks living in the South have supported the new government, while ethnic Kyrgyz have supported Bakiyev.

Bottom Line

The crisis in southern Kyrgyzstan is rooted in a complex mix of ethnic, political, and class-based divisions. Violence in the region has started to subside, leading Kyrgyz interim leader Roza Otunbayeva to drop her request for an external peacekeeping force. However, the question remains as to whether the Kyrgyz government will be able to handle the humanitarian disaster created by tens of thousands of displaced ethnic Uzbeks.

Survey Methods

Results are based on face-to-face interviews with approximately 1,000 Kyrgyzstani adults, aged 15 and older, conducted June 13-July 10, 2009. For results based on the total sample of national adults, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points. In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.

Source: http://www.gallup.com/poll/140771/ethnic-tensions-evident-kyrgyzstan-conflict.aspx

---------------
The complete detailed weekly reports of the project can be found on theGilani's Gallopedia website.